Pages: [1]
bigben
BAM!ID: 13664
Joined: 2006-12-01
Posts: 4
Credits: 4,279
World-rank: 2,085,815

2006-12-21 16:21:52

title says it all. is it really worth switching to a blank-screen screensaver or not?
PovAddict
BAM!ID: 115
Joined: 2006-05-10
Posts: 1013
Credits: 5,785,239
World-rank: 78,495

2006-12-21 16:25:31

Depends on which project. The most intensive one is CPDN one. BOINC tries to limit the percentage of CPU the screensaver uses, and this was improved even more on recent BOINC versions.

Most BOINC screensavers (if not all) use your graphics card more than your CPU, so it won't really make your computing slower.
bigben
BAM!ID: 13664
Joined: 2006-12-01
Posts: 4
Credits: 4,279
World-rank: 2,085,815

2006-12-21 16:27:16

Do you happen to know anything about the projects lhc, ralph, rosetta and einstein?
Thanks!

--Ben
saccia
BAM!ID: 9892
Joined: 2006-10-20
Posts: 12
Credits: 865,229
World-rank: 230,638

2007-01-11 00:54:30

title says it all. is it really worth switching to a blank-screen screensaver or not?


I think it's worth using the blank screen. I've always run it like that. After all, screensavers aren't really needed these days anyhow and any computation wasted on drawing a pretty picture on the screen is waste in my opinion. However, I do like being able to manually popup the graphics every once in a while to check on things... like for CPDN.
Pages: [1]

Index :: BOINC :: how much CPU does the screensaver use?
Reason: