» Search forum


Index :: BOINCstats general :: Last XML Update


Pages: [1]
AlphaLaser
BAM!ID: 4118
Joined: 2006-08-16
Posts: 98
Credits: 1,209,990,414
World-rank: 2,022

2007-02-17 18:08:44

The new rollovers make it look much more streamlined and cleaner. Thanks Willy!
PovAddict
BAM!ID: 115
Joined: 2006-05-10
Posts: 1013
Credits: 5,785,239
World-rank: 78,968

2007-02-17 19:16:44

In my opinion they are annoying. And a user without Javascript can't see the date of last change. Also, I can't select and copy the '12:34:56 ago' indicator.
Son Goku 3SSJ
 
Forum moderator - Translator
BAM!ID: 8
Joined: 2006-01-11
Posts: 182
Credits: 2,572,985
World-rank: 128,492

2007-02-17 19:38:08

I also think that the new layout looks better and compacter
part of
Wenn jeder an sich denkt, wird an alle gedacht!
DoctorNow
    Donator
Volunteer tester
BAM!ID: 261
Joined: 2006-05-12
Posts: 353
Credits: 2,491,834,317
World-rank: 1,165

2007-02-17 19:51:44

I agree, it looks much more clearly arranged now
In my opinion they are annoying. And a user without Javascript can't see the date of last change. Also, I can't select and copy the '12:34:56 ago' indicator.

That's unfortunately true with the change.
But you can select the ago-line:
mark the line with the mouse with pressed button, keep pressing and hover it to the last right letter.
At one point the line just changes before the marking can jump over to the the following ones.
Now you can copy it!
BOINC@Heidelberg & BOINC Confederation-member

My BOINCstats/[url=http://signature.statseb.fr/sig-335.png]My badges
AlphaLaser
BAM!ID: 4118
Joined: 2006-08-16
Posts: 98
Credits: 1,209,990,414
World-rank: 2,022

2007-02-17 20:15:10
last modified: 2007-02-17 20:16:01

In my opinion they are annoying. And a user without Javascript can't see the date of last change. Also, I can't select and copy the '12:34:56 ago' indicator.


Might be fixed by adding <noscript> to re-add those for people without JavaScript. Truthfully, the number of people having a browser that does not understand JavaScript is going to be fairly low (w3schools.com says over 94% have it enabled, as of last month). Therefore, it makes more sense to have it than not.
PovAddict
BAM!ID: 115
Joined: 2006-05-10
Posts: 1013
Credits: 5,785,239
World-rank: 78,968

2007-02-17 20:23:00
last modified: 2007-02-17 20:23:36

Might be fixed by adding <noscript> to re-add those for people without JavaScript. Truthfully, the number of people having a browser that does not understand JavaScript is going to be fairly low (w3schools.com says over 94% have it enabled, as of last month). Therefore, it makes more sense to have it than not.

Other way around, people don't disable Javascript because a lot of sites aren't even remotely usable without it.
Pages: [1]

Index :: BOINCstats general :: Last XML Update
Reason: